Incidents

Exploits, cryptographic flaws, governance attacks, sanctions, shutdowns, outages and 51% attacks at the private DeFi protocols, privacy coins and privacy networks this site follows, each with its cause, the response and the sources.

Checked on 23 Oct 2026. Losses in US dollars at the time, as the sources estimate them. Information only, not investment advice.

Incidents counted

62

At 31 projects, 2017 to 2026

Exploits, flaws, attacks, sanctions, shutdowns and outages

Known losses

$28.9M

Across the 17 incidents with a US dollar figure

Largest: Haven Protocol, $8.19M, 22 Jun 2021

Losses in 2026

$14.8M

26 incidents, 11 with a US dollar figure

To 23 Oct 2026, when the list was checked

Recovered

$2.0M

Returned or rescued in 3 incidents

As the sources report it

Known losses by year

The US dollar losses known for each year's incidents, added up, with the number of incidents in the year, including those without a figure.

  1. 2017$585K2 incidents
  2. 2018$2.8M4 incidents
  3. 2019No US dollar figure4 incidents
  4. 2020No US dollar figure1 incident
  5. 2021$8.2M4 incidents
  6. 2022No US dollar figure3 incidents
  7. 2023$2.6M5 incidents
  8. 2024No US dollar figure9 incidents
  9. 2025No US dollar figure4 incidents
  10. 2026$14.8M26 incidents

By the year of each incident's date. 2026 runs to 23 Oct 2026, when the list was checked. Amounts given only in coins are not included; see what the list covers. Select a year to list its incidents.

All incidents

Every incident found, newest first, with its cause, the response, the loss and how it was estimated, and the sources.

62 incidents, $28.9M in known losses.

DateProtocolTypeWhat happenedLossRecoveredSources
Pirate Chain Exploit

Consensus flaws create about 39.8 million unbacked ARRR

Cause: Two consensus flaws, an unchecked coin-import path and a misread time-locked script, let the coins be created and moved into the Sapling shielded pool.

Response: The team asked users not to move funds and exchanges and mining pools to pause, NonKYC restricted the associated account and notaries suspended notarisations; a proposed rollback to 20:00 UTC on 14 October gave way to a coordinated recovery, and mandatory release 6.0.10 of 18 October rejects blocks with the unbacked imports. The team said there was no sign that the zk-SNARK cryptography or the notary keys had been compromised.

about 39.8 million ARRR, about 20% of supplyNo US dollar figure
What the sources say

Coins created without backing, as Crypto Briefing and KuCoin report; no US dollar figure is used here.

None reported
Reported
Privacy Cash Other

Stolen funds reported moving through Privacy Cash

Cause: News reports, citing an on-chain analyst, said the proceeds of a theft of about $4 million from a trader's wallets were swapped into ETH, BNB and SOL and then moved through Privacy Cash and Chainflip. The theft was not from Privacy Cash.

Response: No statement from Privacy Cash about screening or blocking the funds was reported.

Not applicable None reported
Reported
Payy Exploit

About $1.83 million in USDC leaves Payy's rollup contract

Cause: Not confirmed. Payy's GitHub advisory, published in June and recorded as CVE-2026-48100 on 28 September, describes a circuit flaw, fixed in version 1.3.0, that let a registered prover forge burn messages, but neither source links the flaw to the transfer.

Response: The Crypto Times reported that Payy had not commented.

$1.83M1,832,149 USDC
How estimated

The USDC moved out of the rollup contract at 04:21 UTC, as Blockscout records.

None reported
Reported
Zano Exploit

Gateway Address flaw used to mint unauthorised ZANO and fUSD

Cause: A flaw in the Gateway Addresses added by Hard Fork 6 let an attacker create unauthorised ZANO and fUSD, in a first mint on 29 August and another on 25 September 2026, when Zano's tools raised the alarm.

Response: The chain was restarted from block 3,833,000 (release 2.2.3.600), removing about a month of history, including legitimate transactions; payments settled on other chains could not be reversed, and MEXC suspended ZANO and fUSD deposits and withdrawals at the team's request. The team said wallet spend keys were not compromised and affected balances would be recovered without minting new ZANO.

about 18.4 million ZANO in the first mint, and fUSDNo US dollar figure
What the sources say

Bitcoin.com, citing the team, reported over $200 million in illicit tokens; that is the value of the tokens minted rather than a realised loss, so no US dollar figure is used here.

None reported
Reported
Decred Exploit

Consensus bug used to create 2,078 DCR

Cause: A consensus bug present since launch, an unhandled edge case between the regular and stake transaction trees, let an attacker double spend inputs between 12:20 UTC on 16 August and 19:44 UTC on 17 August 2026, after exploiting it on testnet on 14 August; it had been reported to the bug bounty on 12 August.

Response: Mandatory release 2.1.6, published at 15:25 UTC on 18 August, fixed it without a rollback; release 2.1.7 of 14 October 2026 added safeguards that halt a node on unexpected spends.

2,077.96933695 DCR createdNo US dollar figure
What the sources say

The coins created, from Decred's post-incident report; no US dollar figure is used here. Decred said the extra coins do not affect the 21 million cap.

None reported
Confirmed
Panther Protocol Governance attack

Malicious proposal drains ZKP on Panther's Base deployment

Cause: The attacker passed a proposal through the Base deployment's optimistic governance on Reality.eth, posting an uncontested answer with the required 0.5 ETH bond, and the proposal upgraded the ZKP token proxies on Base to a drainer.

Response: A Panther Foundation contributor said the Base deployment was not yet in production and no user funds were compromised.

$7,5785.12 million ZKP and 0.12 ETH
How estimated

DefiLlama's figure; The Crypto Times reported 5.12 million ZKP and 0.12 ETH drained.

None reported
Not verified
Tornado Cash Other

Lapsed tornado.cash domain used for phishing

Cause: The project's original domain had lapsed and was reportedly registered by others, who used it for a copy of the interface built to capture deposit notes.

Response: TORN holders added a phishing warning to the community interface and in October 2026 voted to pay 1,000 TORN to two people for having the fraudulent site taken down.

Not known
What the sources say

One user reportedly lost about 1,010 ETH, a figure from community reports that had not been independently confirmed.

None reported
Reported
Aztec Network Cryptographic flaw

Alpha V5 proving system flaw

Cause: The V5 Alpha proving system could be tricked into accepting a proof for a transaction the network should reject. Core contributors found it on 27 July 2026 through internal AI-assisted auditing.

Response: Disclosed on 7 August 2026, with application teams told to treat V5 funds and applications as exposed and to pause V5 deployments; circuit updates in V6, planned for later in 2026, are to stop the network accepting proofs tied to the affected proving system.

Not known
What the sources say

Contributors said they could not determine whether anyone had exploited it.

None reported
Confirmed
zkBob Shutdown

zkBob reopens in withdraw-only mode

Cause: zkBob deprecated the protocol after the double-spend flaw found in June 2026.

Response: The Polygon and Optimism pools restarted in withdraw-only mode, and users were urged to withdraw.

Not applicable None reported
Confirmed
Hinkal Exploit

Hinkal's shielded pool drained through a double spend

Cause: BlockSec said the likely cause was a legacy note format that did not tie each note to a single nullifier, so one deposit could be spent several times; reports describe a proofless deposit followed by a series of transact calls.

Response: No post-mortem from Hinkal was found; BlockSec published its analysis on 9 July 2026.

$820,000
How estimated

DefiLlama's and AMBCrypto's figure, in USDC; BlockSec estimated about $800K.

None reported
Reported
Tornado Cash Governance attack

Malicious proposal 67 rejected

Cause: Proposal 67's contract code had not been verified, and L2BEAT flagged it as malicious.

Response: TORN holders rejected it, with about 623,000 votes against and none in favour when voting closed on 30 June 2026.

None reported
What the sources say

The proposal did not pass.

None reported
Confirmed
Namada Exploit

Namada's shielded pool drained

Cause: Not published. DefiLlama classifies it as an unbacked cross-chain mint. The loss went unnoticed at first because the indexer kept showing balances while live RPC checks showed the pool empty.

Response: Namada confirmed the breach on 20 June 2026 and asked the attacker to return the funds.

$600,000
How estimated

DefiLlama's figure; press reports put it at roughly $600,000 in ATOM, USDC, OSMO, TIA and NYM.

None reported
Reported
zk.money (Aztec private rollup) Exploit

Aztec's deprecated private rollup bridge drained

Cause: A validation flaw let the attacker withdraw assets while still passing on-chain verification. BlockSec described this and the Aztec Connect bug as circuit public input binding issues, and Rekt News attributed it to a flaw in the escape hatch circuit.

Response: Aztec Labs said it held no admin keys or control over the immutable contract of the payments product it deprecated in 2022, and the Aztec Foundation said the product had no links to the current network or the AZTEC token.

$2.17MAbout 1,158 ETH, 150,000 DAI and 0.47 renBTC
How estimated

PeckShield's estimate, cited by The Block, which reported the exploit on 18 June 2026; Rekt News and DefiLlama date it 17 June.

None reported
Reported
Aztec Connect Exploit

Second drain of the same Aztec Connect contract

Cause: The same boundary bypass, used by a second address from about 04:00 to 05:17 UTC on 15 June 2026 against positions left in the contract's DeFi bridges after the first drain.

Response: Rekt News did not confirm whether the same party controlled both addresses.

$88,000
How estimated

Rekt News's figure of about $88K.

None reported
Reported
Aztec Connect Exploit

Deprecated Aztec Connect contract drained

Cause: A gap between the transactions the deprecated RollupProcessor contract settled and those covered by the proof's public inputs: the attacker set the number of real transactions to one in 14 processRollup calls, so a fake deposit was credited while a real withdrawal was settled.

Response: A second address drained about $88,000 more through the same flaw the next day (listed separately).

$2.19M
How estimated

SlowMist's figure; Rekt News lists 908.99 ETH, 270,513 DAI, 167.89 wstETH and smaller amounts of four other tokens.

None reported
Reported
Secret Network Exploit

Axelar bridge contract on Secret drained through an infinite mint

Cause: A years-old minting flaw in a CW20-ICS20 contract tied to Secret Network's Axelar integration let the attacker mint wrapped tokens without backing.

Response: The bridge to Axelar was suspended, and the two teams disputed which of them was responsible for the contract.

$4.67M
How estimated

The Defiant's and DefiLlama's figure for seven Axelar-wrapped assets drained between 10 and 17 June 2026.

None reported
Reported
zkBob Cryptographic flaw

Double-spend flaw found in a zkBob circuit

Cause: A critical double-spend vulnerability in one of zkBob's zero-knowledge circuits, found by its security team during a routine review.

Response: All pools were paused. After a circuit fix and a contract upgrade through the governance multisig on 5 July 2026, the pools reopened in withdraw-only mode (listed separately).

Not known
What the sources say

The team said there was no public evidence of exploitation but could not rule it out.

None reported
Confirmed
Zama Other

Court-ordered USDC freeze locks the cUSDC wrapper

Cause: A US federal court order in a class action over Overnight Finance, an unrelated protocol, led Circle to blacklist the Ethereum cUSDC wrapper at 01:08 UTC on 30 May 2026, because a disputed deposit made up more than 99% of the pool.

Response: Zama paused cUSDC, cUSDT and cWETH while it investigated, The Block reported. Circle removed the block at 18:58 UTC on 1 June 2026 after the court lifted the freeze, and Zama announced the next day that all systems were back to normal.

None reported
What the sources say

About $12.6M of USDC was locked from 30 May to 1 June 2026 and then released.

None reported
Confirmed
Zcash Cryptographic flaw

Orchard circuit soundness flaw

Cause: A soundness flaw in the Orchard circuit, found during an audit commissioned by Shielded Labs and reported on 29 May 2026, could have allowed theft and balance violations within Orchard.

Response: An emergency soft fork disabled Orchard transactions on 2 June 2026, and NU6.2 restored them with a corrected circuit on 3 June.

None reported
What the sources say

Developers found no evidence of exploitation.

None reported
Confirmed
Renegade Exploit

Legacy Arbitrum dark pool re-initialised and drained

Cause: The V1 dark pool on Arbitrum had been deployed without an explicit owner, and a faulty migration in an April 2025 update left its version counter out of sync, so anyone could re-initialise the contract.

Response: Renegade offered a 10% bounty, and the attacker returned about $190,000 within 45 minutes. Renegade said about 7% of its trading went through the affected pool, other deployments were unaffected and affected users would be compensated.

$209,000
How estimated

Blockaid's figure, reported by crypto.news; DefiLlama gives the same.

$190,000
Reported
Zcash Other

Several node vulnerabilities disclosed

Cause: Several vulnerabilities in the zcashd and Zebra node software, including one that could have disabled turnstile accounting.

Response: Patched before disclosure on 17 April 2026; Zodl said none could by themselves have inflated the ZEC supply.

None reported
What the sources say

Zodl said they were not exploited to affect the consensus chain.

None reported
Confirmed
Zcash Cryptographic flaw

zcashd skipped Sprout proof verification

Cause: A zcashd bug made nodes skip Sprout proof verification for new blocks, so invalid transactions from a miner could have drained the deprecated Sprout pool. Zebra nodes were not affected.

Response: Reported by the security researcher Alex Sol on 23 March 2026, fixed in zcashd 6.12.0 and disclosed on 31 March; the turnstile ruled out supply inflation.

None reported
What the sources say

Not exploited, according to the disclosure; up to about 25,400 ZEC in the Sprout pool had been at risk.

None reported
Confirmed
Privacy Pools Cryptographic flaw

SDK generated keys with too little entropy

Cause: The version 1 SDK converted key material to a standard JavaScript number, which left newly generated account keys with less than the intended 256 bits of entropy.

Response: 0xbow fixed the conversion on 18 March 2026 and released a migration flow on 19 March so that existing users could move their accounts to stronger keys.

None reported
What the sources say

No losses were reported in the sources cited.

None reported
Confirmed
FOOM Cash Exploit

FOOM Cash drained through a misconfigured verifier

Cause: The zero-knowledge lottery's Groth16 verifier kept default setup values, which let the attacker forge proofs.

Response: A white-hat rescue returned $1.84 million, Rekt News reported.

$2.26M
How estimated

Rekt News's and DefiLlama's figure, across Ethereum and Base.

$1.84M
Reported
Veil Cash Exploit

Veil Cash loses 2.9 ETH to a verifier flaw

Cause: The same kind of flaw that FOOM Cash suffered days later: a Groth16 verifier that kept default setup values, which let forged proofs pass.

Response: The ETH was later returned, Rekt News reported.

$5,0002.9 ETH
How estimated

DefiLlama's figure, which it dates 21 February 2026; Rekt News reported 2.9 ETH taken around 20 February.

$5,000
Reported
Zama Outage

Access-control contract paused for 84 minutes

Cause: Not confirmed: the contract that records which addresses may use or decrypt each encrypted value was paused at 14:17 UTC by an address authorised to pause it, and Zama's reason has not been confirmed.

Response: Unpaused at 15:41 UTC through the execution of a governance proposal.

None reported
What the sources say

No losses were reported.

None reported
Confirmed
Secret Network Cryptographic flaw

Forged enclave attestations shown on testnet

Cause: WireTap and Battering RAM, physical attacks on Intel SGX servers that need special equipment, let researchers forge attestations; on Secret Network's testnet they created a forged enclave that accessed confidential data. The researchers said they extracted nothing from mainnet.

Response: Version 1.22 suspended new nodes, set up an allowlist of trusted nodes and rotated the network seed as a precaution; version 1.23 was to admit new nodes through governance.

None reported
What the sources say

Secret Network said the attacks can only put data privacy at risk and cannot affect funds.

None reported
Confirmed
Monero Other

18-block chain reorganisation

Cause: An 18-block reorganisation starting at height 3,499,659; The Block reported that responsibility had not been established.

Response: Temporary rolling DNS checkpoints, which the Monero Research Lab had urged developers to consider, remained an open proposal with no linked code in October 2026.

Not known
What the sources say

More than 100 transactions were invalidated; no losses were quantified.

None reported
Reported
Monero Other

Wallet sent outgoing transaction IDs to remote nodes

Cause: Wallet versions 0.12.0.0 to 0.18.4.1 sent the IDs of a wallet's outgoing transactions to the connected node whenever the wallet was loaded, even an untrusted remote node, whose operator could use them to infer later spends.

Response: Version 0.18.4.2, released the same day as the disclosure, fixed the bug.

None reported
What the sources say

No funds were at stake; the concern is privacy.

None reported
Confirmed
Monero 51% attack

Qubic claims a majority of Monero's hashrate

Cause: The Qubic mining pool said it had reached 51% of the hashrate, and The Block reported a six-block-deep reorganisation; a Serai developer called it a reorganisation attack rather than a full 51% attack. A December 2025 preprint found more orphaned blocks and deeper reorganisations during the campaign but no sustained majority control.

Response: Kraken paused XMR deposits as a precaution, according to Cointelegraph. Temporary rolling DNS checkpoints were proposed on GitHub on 31 August 2025.

None reported
What the sources say

No losses were reported in the sources cited.

None reported
Reported
Monero Other

Ban list recommended against suspected spy nodes

Cause: A spying party ran a few nodes behind many IP addresses, which weakens the privacy that Dandelion++ gives transaction relay; many of the addresses sit in a few subnets linked to the LinkingLion spying seen on Bitcoin.

Response: The Monero Research Lab recommended that node operators enable a voluntary ban list of the suspected IP addresses, compiled by a Cuprate developer, rather than blocking them by default.

None reported
What the sources say

No funds were at stake; the concern is privacy.

None reported
Reported
Aleo Cryptographic flaw

Inflation bug in Aleo's output commitments

Cause: The output commitment scheme did not include an output's subtype in the hash, so an attacker could swap a Future output for a Private one with the same hash and the on-chain finalize logic would never run.

Response: Reported by zkSecurity on 24 November 2024 and confirmed by Aleo the same day; the fix was merged on 3 December and rolled out to all validators on 4 December 2024.

None reported
What the sources say

Aleo scanned the full chain history on 25 November 2024 and found no evidence of exploitation.

None reported
Confirmed
Wasabi Wallet Exploit

Replaced installer, coordinator outages and a fee exploit

Cause: Over 9 and 10 July 2024 an account with write access to the GitHub repository was compromised and the Windows installer of version 2.0.8.1 replaced with a different file; several free coordinators, mainly the busiest, were repeatedly taken down by denial-of-service attacks; and a coordinator used a fee weakness to charge users the maximum fee.

Response: A monitoring bot spotted the installer's changed hash; the file was removed and access rights revoked, and version 2.1.0.0 let clients cap the fees and set the minimum round size they accept.

Not known
What the sources say

No figure for the fees charged, or for any loss from the replaced installer, is given in the sources cited.

None reported
Confirmed
Wasabi Wallet Shutdown

zkSNACKs ends the Wasabi coinjoin coordinator

Cause: ForkLog said the decision followed increasing law enforcement pressure on mixers.

Response: The coordination service stopped from 1 June 2024, which also affected Trezor Suite and BTCPay Server users.

Not applicable None reported
Reported
Nocturne Shutdown

Nocturne closes

Cause: The team announced the company's closure about five months after discontinuing version 1 of the protocol; GNcrypto reported no reason.

Response: Users could withdraw through the Nocturne app until the end of June 2024, after which self-service withdrawal tools were to be published on GitHub.

Not applicable None reported
Reported
Samourai Wallet Shutdown

Samourai Wallet servers seized and founders charged

Cause: US prosecutors charged the founders with money laundering and unlicensed money transmitting conspiracies, alleging more than $2 billion in unlawful transactions.

Response: Samourai's servers and domain were seized with Icelandic authorities. The court cases that followed are on the Timeline.

Not applicable None reported
Confirmed
Monero Other

Suspected black marble flooding

Cause: Transaction volume rose sharply from 4 March 2024. A Monero Research Lab researcher's preliminary analysis treated it as a suspected flood of one party's own transactions, which would fill other users' rings with decoys that party can rule out.

Response: The analysis set out countermeasures, including larger ring sizes.

None reported
What the sources say

No funds were at stake; the concern is privacy.

None reported
Reported
Elusiv Shutdown

Elusiv announces its sunset

Cause: The source cited gives no reason.

Response: QuickNode's guide to the Solana privacy protocol says it announced the sunset on 29 February 2024 and keeps the guide for historic educational purposes only.

Not applicable None reported
Reported
Tornado Cash Exploit

Malicious interface code leaked deposit notes

Cause: An interface version pinned through a governance proposal contained hidden JavaScript that sent users' deposit notes to an outside server, exposing deposits made through public IPFS gateways from early January 2024.

Response: The leak was disclosed in late February 2024, and a governance proposal executed in March 2024 replaced that version.

Not known
What the sources say

CoinDesk reported that one deposit had been stolen; no total was published.

None reported
Reported
Monero Exploit

Community Crowdfunding System wallet drained

Cause: Not found: the Core Team said it had not identified the cause of the breach.

Response: The Core Team disclosed the theft on 4 November 2023 and covered the loss from the General Fund.

$376,8112,675.73 XMR
How estimated

The wallet's whole balance, 2,675.73 XMR, at Coin Metrics' reference price for 1 September 2023 ($140.83), as PriFi.info estimates it; the Core Team gave no US dollar figure.

None reported
Confirmed
Dash Outage

Chain halts during the v19 activation

Cause: Dash's chief technology officer said there was a problem during the activation of Dash Core v19, and the chain stopped producing blocks at block 1,874,879.

Response: The team said it had what it needed to resolve the issue; the source cited gives no time for the restart.

None reported
What the sources say

No losses were reported in the source cited.

None reported
Reported
Tornado Cash Governance attack

Attacker takes over Tornado Cash governance

Cause: Governance proposal 20 contained hidden code that granted the attacker 1.2 million votes and control of the DAO. The immutable pools could not be drained.

Response: On 26 May 2023 TORN holders passed the attacker's own proposal 21 handing control back, with about 517,000 votes in favour and none against.

$2.17MAbout 483,000 TORN
How estimated

DefiLlama's figure for the TORN taken from the governance vault. The Block reported that 379,000 TORN had been sold for about $680,000 in ether.

None reported
Reported
Aztec Connect Shutdown

Aztec Connect sunset announced

Cause: Aztec Labs decided to wind down the Aztec Connect privacy rollup.

Response: Deposits were disabled in March 2023 (on 21 March, according to its documentation) and withdrawals were processed for a year, to 31 March 2024. The rollup's code is open source, so anyone can still publish blocks.

Not applicable None reported
Confirmed
Railgun Other

FBI says North Korean hackers moved stolen ether through Railgun

Cause: The FBI said on 23 January 2023 that North Korea's Lazarus Group was behind the June 2022 theft from Harmony's Horizon bridge and had used Railgun on 13 January 2023 to launder more than $60 million of the stolen ether.

Response: In April 2024 Railgun called this a false allegation and said its Private Proofs of Innocence system blocks such actors.

Not applicable None reported
Confirmed
Secret Network Cryptographic flaw

Consensus seed extracted through Intel SGX flaws

Cause: The SGX.Fail researchers used Intel SGX flaws made public on 9 August 2022 to obtain Secret Network's consensus seed, a master decryption key for its private transactions. They began their disclosure on 1 October 2022.

Response: Registration of new nodes was frozen and, from 2 November 2022, reopened only to hardware that was not vulnerable.

None reported
What the sources say

SCRT Labs told The Block that funds were never at risk; the researchers said the privacy of past transactions could no longer be guaranteed.

None reported
Reported
Tornado Cash Sanction

US Treasury sanctions Tornado Cash

Cause: OFAC said Tornado Cash had been used to launder more than $7 billion since its creation in 2019, including over $455 million stolen by North Korea's Lazarus Group.

Response: OFAC redesignated it on 8 November 2022 with North Korea-related grounds added, and removed it from the sanctions list on 21 March 2025.

Not applicable None reported
Confirmed
Zcash Outage

Spam transactions stall light wallets

Cause: From June 2022, shortly after NU5, transactions with very large numbers of shielded outputs swelled the chain and stopped several light wallets from syncing.

Response: The ZIP 317 fee change, shipped in zcashd 5.5.0 in April 2023, throttled the spam, and the Electric Coin Company ended its emergency response on 1 November 2023.

None reported
What the sources say

No funds were reported lost, but some users could not reach their funds for a time.

None reported
Confirmed
Haven Protocol Exploit

xAsset minting exploits

Cause: Flaws in Haven Protocol's private xAsset code let attackers mint assets without backing.

Response: The team halted exchange deposits, paused conversions and proposed a chain rollback.

$8.19M
How estimated

DefiLlama's figure. The team reported 203,000 xUSD and 13.5 xBTC minted on 22 June, an unknown amount of XHV on 24 June and 9 million xUSD on 29 June 2021.

None reported
Reported
Firo Exploit

Lelantus switched off after suspicious transactions

Cause: Irregular behaviour and suspicious transactions in Lelantus, whose cause the team looked for with Trail of Bits, the cryptographer Sarang Noether and a black hat.

Response: The team switched Lelantus off with its emergency switch; it was re-enabled after a hard fork at block 365,544 with Firo v14.6.0, announced on 26 April 2021.

Not known
What the sources say

No figure for coins created was published in the sources found.

None reported
Confirmed
Verge Other

Reorganisation of more than 560,000 blocks

Cause: Coin Metrics staff reported a reorganisation of more than 560,000 blocks that erased about 200 days of transaction history. The Verge team said malicious nodes had sent transaction spam that failed to cause a fork and that there was no 51% attack.

Response: The team said its explorer's database had been corrupted and was resyncing, and that holders' coins were safe.

Not known
What the sources say

No losses were quantified in the source cited.

None reported
Reported
Firo 51% attack

51% attack rolls back more than 300 blocks

Cause: An attacker with a majority of the hashrate mined a private chain that replaced more than 300 blocks, reversing deposits made to exchanges.

Response: Firo locked the attacker's proceeds, held in one address with 867,652 FIRO, set a maximum reorganisation depth of five blocks, briefly disabled Lelantus and brought forward ChainLocks to block 341100 (about 28 January 2021); it put the handling of the locked funds to a community vote.

989,513 FIRO reported by two exchangesNo US dollar figure
What the sources say

Binance reported losses of 906,771 FIRO and Indodax 82,741 FIRO; Firo's post-mortem gives no US dollar figure.

None reported
Confirmed
Monero Other

Sybil attack on the peer-to-peer network

Cause: Malicious nodes injected themselves into honest nodes' peer lists, exploiting a bug that made them more likely to be chosen, dropped transactions and recorded IP addresses to try to link them to transactions. Decrypt reported on 10 November 2020 that it had been running for about ten days.

Response: The nodes were blacklisted. Dandelion++, in place since April 2020, and broadcasting over Tor limited what they could learn.

None reported
What the sources say

No funds were at stake; Riccardo Spagni said the attack had no effect on Monero's on-chain privacy.

None reported
Reported
Monero Other

Download site served a malicious wallet build

Cause: getmonero.org briefly served a malicious build of the command-line wallet.

Response: The project moved downloads to another source and told anyone who downloaded the wallet between 02:30 and 16:30 UTC to check file hashes and not run mismatching files.

Not known
What the sources say

The project's warning gives no figure for funds taken.

None reported
Confirmed
Tornado Cash Cryptographic flaw

MiMC circuit flaw allowed forged deposit proofs

Cause: A flaw in the circomlib MiMC hash circuit used by the pools would have let anyone forge a proof of deposit and withdraw funds.

Response: The team used the flaw to drain the mixer, patched the circuits and moved users' funds to new contracts, as described in its post 'Tornado.cash got hacked. By us.'

None reported
What the sources say

The team drained the pools itself before anyone else could and moved users' funds to new contracts.

None reported
Reported
Dash Other

Transaction spikes crash masternodes

Cause: Two large spikes in transactions, from either a malicious actor or a developer running a stress test; masternodes crashed or cut each other off, some pools mined near-empty blocks, some payments were delayed and average fees rose from $0.01 to $0.18.

Response: Dash Core 0.14.0.3 added protections against spam attacks and stress tests.

None reported
What the sources say

No losses were reported in the source cited.

None reported
Reported
Firo Cryptographic flaw

Zerocoin flaw used to create coins on Zcoin, now Firo

Cause: A fundamental flaw in the cryptography of the Zerocoin protocol.

Response: Zcoin moved from Zerocoin to its own Sigma protocol later in 2019, according to its review of the year.

54,321 XZCNo US dollar figure
What the sources say

Firo said the flaw resulted in an inflation of 54,321 XZC, 0.58% of the supply then circulating; it gives no US dollar figure.

None reported
Reported
Monero Other

Burning bug in the Monero wallet

Cause: The wallet gave no warning on receiving a burnt output. An attacker could reuse one transaction key so that many payments landed on one stealth address, of which only one could ever be spent, leaving an exchange with unspendable deposits at the cost of network fees.

Response: A private patch (pull request 4438) was applied on top of the 0.12.3.0 release branch for affected organisations before the public post-mortem of 25 September 2018.

None reported
What the sources say

The project described the attack as hypothetical and reported no losses; the protocol and the coin supply were not affected.

None reported
Confirmed
Verge 51% attack

Second timestamp attack mints 35 million XVG

Cause: The attacker repeated the timestamp attack, this time across two of Verge's mining algorithms, Scrypt and lyra2re.

Response: The sources cited describe no fix.

$1.75MAbout 35 million XVG
How estimated

DefiLlama's figure. CryptoSlate reported about 35 million XVG minted ahead of schedule.

None reported
Reported
Verge 51% attack

Timestamp attack mines blocks about once a second

Cause: The attacker exploited a difficulty-retargeting bug by mining blocks with spoofed timestamps, producing a block about once a second for some three hours on the Scrypt algorithm.

Response: The team called it a small hash attack and hard-forked to undo the exploited blocks, which left the network unable to sync until it was re-synced; Security Affairs said the underlying issue was not fully resolved.

$1M
How estimated

Security Affairs reported that the attacker made off with roughly $1 million worth of tokens.

None reported
Reported
Zcash Cryptographic flaw

Counterfeiting flaw in the Sprout proving system

Cause: A flaw in the proving system of the original Sprout pool (CVE-2019-7167) could have let an attacker create fake ZEC without being detected. It did not affect user privacy.

Response: Found by an Electric Coin Company cryptographer on 1 March 2018 and kept private, closed by the Sapling upgrade of 28 October 2018, and disclosed on 5 February 2019.

None reported
What the sources say

The Electric Coin Company found no evidence that anyone had exploited it.

None reported
Confirmed
Monero Cryptographic flaw

Key image flaw in CryptoNote patched

Cause: A flaw in CryptoNote key images could have allowed unlimited coin creation, undetectable to an observer.

Response: Patched without public disclosure on 21 February 2017 and disclosed on 17 May 2017.

None reported
What the sources say

The developers said a scan of the chain showed the flaw had never been exploited on Monero.

None reported
Confirmed
Firo Exploit

Zerocoin code typo lets an attacker reuse spend proofs on Zcoin, now Firo

Cause: One extra character in Zcoin's Zerocoin code let an attacker reuse valid proofs to make extra spends; the team said the bug was not a weakness in the cryptography and had not compromised anonymity.

Response: Zcoin announced the bug and its estimate of the coins created, according to The Hacker News.

$585,000about 370,000 XZC
How estimated

The Hacker News put the coins taken at about $585,000; the team estimated that about 370,000 XZC were created and almost all sold, for a profit of about 410 BTC.

None reported
Reported

What the list covers

What the figures count

Losses
US dollars at the time, as the sources estimate them, not converted at later prices. 17 incidents have a US dollar figure; 5 give an amount only in coins, which is shown but not converted or added up; 22 report no loss, 9 a loss of unknown size, and for 9, such as a sanction or a shutdown, no loss applies. One figure is PriFi.info's own estimate: an amount in coins at Coin Metrics' reference price for that day (Coin Metrics Community Data, CC BY-NC 4.0). Open "How estimated" in a row for where its figure comes from.
Recovered
Funds returned by the attacker or rescued by others, where a source gives a US dollar figure. Funds frozen or locked by a project are described in its response instead.
DefiLlama
11 entries cite DefiLlama's list of hacks beside the reports, and several figures are DefiLlama's. Data: DefiLlama.
Dates
The day the incident happened or the flaw was found, where a source gives it, otherwise the month. A flaw disclosed later is listed at the day it was found, and its response says when it was disclosed.
Confidence
Of the 62 incidents, 27 rest on a primary source, such as the project's own disclosure (Confirmed), 34 on press or security firm reports (Reported) and 1 on sources that could not be opened in full (Not verified).

What the list leaves out

Elsewhere on the site
Exchange delistings are on Access and rules, and arrests, trials and other court cases on the Timeline, as are sanctions on custodial Bitcoin mixers such as Blender.io and Sinbad.io.
Searched, none found
Searches on 23 Oct 2026 found no incident to list for Oasis Sapphire, Penumbra, Fhenix, Inco, Umbra Privacy or Arcium, and DefiLlama's list of hacks names no rug pull among the protocols on the Protocols page. Absence from this list does not mean a protocol is safe.
Coverage
Every protocol on the Protocols page was looked up in DefiLlama's list of hacks, and the larger ones, those with a known exploit, flaw, sanction or shutdown, the privacy coins and the privacy networks on the Watchlist were also searched in the press and in the projects' own disclosures. Small forks and copies of these protocols are not covered. 19 of the projects have a profile on this site, linked from their name.

Types of incident

Exploit 19 incidents
Funds taken by abusing a flaw in a protocol's code, keys or interface.
Cryptographic flaw 12 incidents
A flaw in a proof system, a circuit, key generation or the secure hardware that holds keys, found and closed, whether or not anyone used it.
Governance attack 3 incidents
A malicious proposal passed, or put to a vote, to take control of a protocol or its funds.
Sanction 1 incident
A government sanctions designation of a protocol.
Shutdown 6 incidents
A service closed by its team or seized by the authorities.
Rug none found
A team taking users' funds, or abandoning a project with them.
Outage 3 incidents
A pause or failure that stopped people using a protocol for a time.
51% attack 4 incidents
A miner or pool with most of the hashrate rewriting recent blocks, or saying it controls most of it.
Other 14 incidents
Attacks on the peer-to-peer network, privacy bugs, reported misuse and freezes that fit none of the types above.

Every entry was checked on 23 Oct 2026, and each links the documents it rests on. The list can be downloaded as incidents.csv from the Data page. A listing here is not a judgement of a project's safety, and no listing is an endorsement. Information only, not investment advice.